Law.com – Federal Judge Undoes Key Ruling on Surveillance Evidence

Federal Judge Undoes Key Ruling on Surveillance Evidence

By Michael Tarm All Articles

The Associated Press

September 4, 2013

A federal judge in a Chicago terrorism case has undone a key ruling where she found the government need not divulge whether its investigation relied on expanded phone and Internet surveillance programs — opening the sensitive issue back up to debate.

U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman took the rare step over the weekend of vacating that initial finding days after siding with government attorneys prosecuting Adel Daoud, a 19-year-old U.S. citizen accused of trying to ignite what he thought was a bomb next to a downtown Chicago bar last year.

Former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden leaked documents revealing the scope of U.S. surveillance programs earlier this year.

If they learn the government did use enhanced surveillance to trigger its investigation of Daoud, defense lawyers have said they would challenge subsequent evidence on grounds it violated protections against unreasonable searches.

Coleman last week seemed to dash defense hopes of mounting such a constitutional challenge when she accepted prosecutors’ argument that — because they don’t intend to use evidence derived directly from expanded surveillance at Daoud’s trial — they aren’t required to disclose if they relied on the programs.

In a brief docket entry Sunday, however, Coleman granted a defense motion that she vacate her earlier ruling. The judge wrote that she found “no prejudice in allowing further examination of this issue.”

Both defense attorneys and a prosecutors’ spokesman declined comment Tuesday.

Daoud has pleaded not guilty to the terrorism charges. Last Thursday, prosecutors announced he was also being charged with soliciting an FBI agent’s murder while behind bars; defense lawyers denied the accusation.

Follow Michael Tarm at http://www.twitter.com/mtarm

Copyright 2013 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read more: http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202617953606&Federal_Judge_Undoes_Key_Ruling_on_Surveillance_Evidence#ixzz2e17LpkJB

About Aaron Law Firm

Aaron Law Firm handles criminal cases in city, state and federal courts in the state of Alabama. If you are accused of a crime it has to be taken seriously, even accusation of a crime can have serious effect on many different areas of your life. If it is a DUI or something more serious it has to be taken as a threat to your freedom. After you have been accused of a crime, you should always consult a lawyer before talking to the authorities . Seek immediate legal counsel and make sure your rights are protected.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: